Ian I will put all interesting news and statistics I come across

Friday, November 28, 2008

$8 Trillion Reasons To Worry About Inflation


Nov 25th, 2008 | By Eric J Fry | Category: Featured

Nations do not purchase their prosperity, says Eric Fry. Since this crisis started last year, the government has thrown around $8 trillion at the problem. But these are banknotes that it has manufactured for itself. And that’s why we may soon face a severe threat from inflation.

This from The Rude Awakening:

Citigroup did not go bankrupt yesterday, therefore the Dow Jones Industrial Average soared nearly 400 points. If Citigroup does not go bankrupt tomorrow, there’s no telling how high the Dow might go.

Joy and jubilation returned to Wall Street yesterday because the federal government tossed a $326 billion lifeline to Citigroup - $306 billion worth of loan guarantees and $20 billion of actual cash. Unfortunately, Dow points aren’t as cheap as they used to be. Remember last March, when the Treasury handed a $30 billion check to J.P. Morgan to finance the Bear Stearns takeover? The Dow rallied 187 points on the news – or about one point per $160 million of bailout money.

By comparison, each one of yesterday’s Dow points cost $823 million. Alas, a law of diminishing returns seems to be taking hold. So even if we believed that the Treasury could buy a new bull market, the results would not come cheap. At $823 million per point, the price of sending the Dow to a new record high would be a whopping $4.7 trillion.

Unfortunately, an opposite tendency pertains: the more the Treasury spends, the more the market tumbles. Would you believe that the federal government has ACTUALLY committed $7.7 trillion worth of bailouts, loans and guarantees since the credit crisis erupted last year? And would you believe that the Dow has tumbled more than 5,700 points since this bailout bonanza began?

So, let’s see, that about one Dow point LOST for every $1.3 billion of bailout monies.

In no small bit of irony, the Treasury unveiled its very first bailout facility, the $80 billion “Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit” (MLEC) on October 15, 2007 – just one week after the Dow registered its all-time high. Although the much-ballyhooed MLEC never actually materialized, it launched a wacky, new era of subsidized corporate failure and governmental caprice. Each new bailout has arrived on the scene as a “necessary evil.” But now we’ve got so many of these little devils running around that all hell has broken loose.

It’s entirely possible, of course, that all these devilish bailout programs will transform the devastated financial markets into a heaven on earth… or at least a heaven on Wall Street. But the early evidence is not very comforting.

According to a team of number-crunchers at Bloomberg News, “The U.S. government is prepared to provide more than $7.7 trillion on behalf of American taxpayers…This unprecedented pledge of funds includes $3.2 trillion already tapped by financial institutions in the biggest response to an economic emergency since the New Deal of the 1930s.”

The Bloomberg calculation includes a broad array of both direct and indirect bailout programs. In addition to the Treasury’s $947 billion TARP program, for example, the Federal Reserve has pledged to protect $2.3 trillion worth of money market funds and the FDIC has promised to guarantee $1.4 trillion worth of bank deposits. Various other programs and “facilities” provide the other $3 trillion worth of loans or guarantees.

Where does all this money come from? No one can really say exactly. But we know where it does NOT come from. It does not come from an enormous piggy bank that is sitting in some federal building in Washington, DC. Nor does it come from a traditional bank account that holds traditional savings. No, this money comes from that elaborate hall of smoke and mirrors known as the Federal Reserve.

This money comes from a monetary “system” that is not really a system at all; it is a work of performace art – an improvisation of a monetary system. The system utilizes an artful combination of promises, accumulated goodwill, foreign borrowings and government IOUs to validate trillions of dollars worth of a paper currency that America prints for itself. As long as this improvisation delights the dollar-holders of the world, all is well. But at some point, they might tire of the performance.

A few dollar-holders may be tiring of the performance already. On news of the Citigroup bailout, for example, the dollar slumped against both gold and the euro, while Treasury bonds also fell. One day does not make a trend, of course. But one year does. For more than a year, the U.S. government has been piling bailout liability upon bailout liability, while simultaneously forcing the Federal Reserve to bury the actual costs inside the complexity of its balance sheet and the opacity of its monetary machinations.

For now, the exact cost of socializing America’s recent financial sins remains a mystery. But even without the details, a couple of observations seem self-evident:

  1. Nation’s do not usually purchase their prosperity, especially not with banknotes that they manufacture for themselves. Nations EARN their prosperity by the sweat of their brows.
  2. The American government and its monetary authorities do not actually possess all the money they are spending, loaning and pledging in their various bailout programs. To the extent, therefore, that these bailout programs must deliver actual cash, the risk of inflation mounts. In other words, the money that does not really exist must come into existence somehow. And all of the possible sources of non-existent cash are inflationary.

Net-net, an inflationary cycle may return sooner than most folks currently imagine. To be sure, a sort of deflation now envelopes the globe. But if the current bailout bonanza continues, this deflationary episode may yield very suddenly to a new inflationary episode…in which case the bull market in commodities might resume on very short notice. Already, gold has rebounded more than $120 from its recent lows of $700 an ounce. And many other commodities are showing signs of life as well.

World Bank Report Reveals China’s Bigger Troubles


Nov 27th, 2008 | By Irwin Greenstein | Category: Emerging Markets

While China made headlines with a historic interest rate cut this week, the World Bank weighed in with a gloomy prediction about China that received scant coverage. For emerging-market investors who missed the story, the World Bank’s assessment of China’s economic performance in 2009 could reshape their strategy for portfolio allocation.

That said, China’s economy is still on track to post impressive growth during a global financial crisis. Unfortunately, this growth won’t meet initial forecasts.

In its latest quarterly report, the World Bank revised China’s growth downward to 7.5% from an earlier projection of 9.2%. The change reflects the World Bank’s view that Beijing isn’t doing enough to shift the country’s reliance away from waning exports to more robust domestic growth.

The Chinese economy grew by 11.9% 2007, in what appears to be the peak in double-digit expansion since 2002. Now facing single-digit prospects in 2009, China’s slower-than-expected advance call into question the global economy overall.

While most pundits see diminished U.S. consumer spending impacting China’s exports, emerging markets worldwide contributed significantly to the export boom of the past few years.

Latin America, Eastern Europe, Russia, Southeast Asia and other regions able to cash in on skyrocketing prices of fossil fuels, metals and grains are themselves suffering from the market turmoil. As commodity prices plummet, the expanding middle classes of these emerging nations begin to contract - reducing spending on consumer goods coming into their countries from China.

Reading between the lines, the World Bank also seems to be saying that the worldwide recession will be here for years to come - further hampering China’s ability to stimulate its economy.

The World Bank’s report also challenges the effectiveness of China’s new $586 billion stimulus package announced earlier this month. The package called for a massive national infrastructure build-out. Given the World Bank’s view of China’s over-reliance on exports, the new stimulus plan could ultimately prove to be a “bridge to nowhere” with no substantial growth for the long-term returns that emerging markets count on for these massive projects.

Obviously, the much ballyhooed stimulus plan isn’t enough to carry the day in China.

The latest rate cut, to 5.58% for loans and 2.52% for deposits, was the fourth cut since September.

Now, potentially like the U.S., China’s lower growth rate next year would rely heavily on higher public spending, according to the World Bank report. This could be a harbinger of how the incoming Obama administration would attempt to fix the U.S. economy based on recent news stories.

Taking into account China’s stimulus plan and other domestic projects, Beijing’s spending would add 4 percentage points in 2009 to the economy compared with 1.5 percentage points in 2007.

Another drain on China’s coffers could be subsidies for the increasing ranks of unemployed factory workers. Shrinking exports mean lower demand for products.

The government has announced new measures to support the economy, out of fear that the crisis and growing unemployment could cause increased public protests, according to AsiaNews.

Facing an epidemic of protests, Public Safety minister Meng Jianzhu warned that local regulators could face “social problems affecting stability.” In particular, there is the danger that the slowdown in exports will cause widespread unemployment.

Gunagzhou province provides a snapshot of where unemployment is heading.

A recent Chinese media report cited data from the Guangzhou Train Station, which showed in early October that the number of departing passengers compared to the same period last year had increased by 128,000.

Guangzhou is one of China’s largest manufacturing export centers.

AddThis